Today’s blog is part two in my science of detection series, and we’ll look at how integrated reasoning in security analysis software leads to better decisions. Be sure to check back in the coming weeks to see the next blogs in our series. In part three, I'll be taking an in-depth look at the signal quality of detectors, such as signatures, anomalies, behaviors, and logs.
If you've been reading our blogs lately, you've seen the term “integrated reasoning” used before, so it’s time to give you a deeper explanation of what it means. Integrated reasoning combines multiple sensors and sensor types for analysis and better detection. Before making a security decision, you must take into account a large number of different factors — simultaneously.
What Is Integrated Reasoning?
Interestingly, when we started using the term, Julie from our marketing team Googled it and pointed out that it was the name of a new test section introduced in the Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) in 2012. What the GMAT section is designed to test in potential MBA candidates is exactly what we mean when we refer to integrated reasoning. It consists of the following skills:
- Two-part analysis: The ability to identify multiple answers as most correct.
- Multi-source reasoning: The ability to reason from multiple sources and types of information.
- Graphic interpretation: The ability to interpret statistical distributions and other graphical information.
- Table analysis: The ability to interpret tabular information such as patterns or historical data and to understand how useful distinct information is to a given decision.
All of these skills provide a combination of perspectives that allow you to reason and reach a well thought out and accurate conclusion. The same reason we are evaluating our potential MBA candidates against this standard is why we would design to this standard for security analysis software, or if you will, a “virtual” security analyst.
What is an MBA graduate but a decision maker? Fortunately, we are training our future business leaders on integrated reasoning skills, but when the number of factors to be considered increases, humans get worse at making decisions -- especially when they need to be made rapidly. Whether from lack of attention, lack of time, bias or a myriad of other reasons, people don’t make rational decisions most of the time.
However, when you’re reasoning and using all of the available information in a systematic manner, you have a much greater chance of identifying the best answer. To put this within a security analysis frame of reference, let’s consider some of the information available to us to make effective security decisions.
What Information Should We Consider?
The most effective security analysis software uses anything that is observable within the environment and reduces the uncertainty that any one event should be investigated.
To achieve integrated reasoning, the software should utilize a combination of detectors, including:
- Signature-based alerts
- Detection analytics
- Threat intelligence
- Additional contextual information
In order to make the right decisions, security analysis software should take into account three important factors: sensors, perspective and context. When you combine different forms of security telemetry, like network security sensors and host-based sensors, you have a greater chance of detecting maliciousness. Then, if you deliberately overlap that diverse suite of sensors, you now have a form of logical triangulation. Then add context, and you can understand the importance of each alert. Boom, a good decision!
Like our theoretical MBA candidate, security analysts have to hold hundreds of relevant factors in their minds simultaneously and are charged with making a number of critical decisions every hour. A tall order for a mere mortal, indeed.
Imagine this: A user receives a phishing email, clicks on the link a week later and is infected by malware. The system anti-virus reports "cleaned" but only found 1 of 4 pieces of malware installed. The remaining malware communicates to a command-and-control server and is used as an internal waypoint for lateral exploration very low and slow. This generates thousands of events over a period of weeks or months, but all of them have varying levels of fidelity. More likely, this is the backstory that an incident responder would eventually assemble potentially months -- or years -- after the fact to explain a breach.
Integrated Reasoning is a must for making sound decisions when it comes to deciding which security alerts to escalate for further examination. But with the amount of incoming data increasing by the minute, security teams are having a hard time keeping up. Your best bet is to choose security analysis software, like the Respond Analyst, that has built-in integrated reasoning capabilities to help with decision-making, so teams can focus on highly likely security incidents.
Curious to see how the Respond Analyst’s integrated reasoning capabilities can help your security team make better decisions? Request a demo today.
Chris has over 30 years of experience in defensive information security; 14 years in the defense and intelligence community and 17 years in commercial industry. He has designed, built and managed global security operations centers and incident response teams for eight of the global fortune-50. As he often says, if you have complaints about today’s security operations model, you can partially blame him. It’s from his first-hand experience in learning the limitations of the man vs. data SecOps model that Chris leads product design and strategy for Respond Software.View all posts by Chris Calvert